Beacons vs MinglyLink: Which is Better?
Picking the right link in bio tool affects how easily followers discover your content, products, and offers—and whether you earn from that traffic. Here's how Beacons and MinglyLink compare.
MinglyLink Team
Tool Comparisons
1 Overview
Beacons positions itself as an all-in-one creator platform with a link hub, storefront, forms, and media kit features. It offers a free plan and paid tiers that unlock advanced customization and commerce options.
MinglyLink focuses on being a free-forever link-in-bio that's fully customizable and built for earning: it includes built-in ad offers and a revenue share so creators can monetize clicks from day one.
2 Feature Comparison
| Feature | MinglyLink | Beacons |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free forever (all core features) | Free plan; paid tiers available |
| Monetization | Built-in ad deals; revenue share on clicks | Storefront, tips/donations; no ad revenue share |
| Customization | Full themes, avatars, banners with no paywalls | Branding/themes; deeper options on paid plans |
| Analytics | Clicks, conversions, and revenue tracking | Traffic & link analytics; advanced on paid plans |
| Commerce | Ad marketplace; external product links | Built-in store for digital items & services |
3 Pros & Cons
MinglyLink
- Free forever, no customization paywalls
- The only tool that pays YOU - 60% revenue share, earn from day one
- SEO-friendly by design with active link safety monitoring
- Newer platform with a smaller ecosystem
- Custom domains not yet available
Beacons
- All-in-one platform (store, forms, media kit)
- Built-in digital product selling
- Professional media kit builder
- Best features on paid plans
- Can be overwhelming for beginners
4 Which One Should You Choose?
If you want an all-in-one platform with a built-in store and media kit tools, and you do not mind paying for premium features, Beacons is worth considering.
But if you want a free link in bio with full customization and built-in ad monetization that actually pays you, MinglyLink is the better choice.